Re: autoconf-WIP branch

On Friday 19 July 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:16:51AM -0400, al davis wrote:
> > My original intent was to put back autoconf when it works,
> > but  still keep the "old" system as an alternative.  I
> > would like to be able to offer Cmake too.
> 
> in the autotools-WIP branch, i have moved the static
> configure script aside. i think thats bad. if both systems
> are supposed to work, we probably should call them
> configure.static and confiugure.gnu (or whatever else, but
> mutually different).

makes sense to me.