C99 compound literals are not formatted correctly with indent's default arguments

Koz Ross <[email protected]> Tue, 5 May 2015 18:08:19 +1200

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gnu.indent.bugs
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

When I try to format the following (using indent with default arguments):

tree_node_s *t = GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC (sizeof (tree_node_s));
*t = (tree_node_s){.val = n,.h = 0};

it ends up looking like this:

tree_node_s *t = GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC (sizeof (tree_node_s));
*t = (tree_node_s)
  {
  .val = n,.h = 0};

Now, this (aside from being really ugly) is not obviously a compound literal from its appearance. This appears to be a bug.

-- 
Koz Ross <[email protected]>
www.retro-freedom.nz
If you aren't using GPG, you should be! https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/
****
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

_______________________________________________
bug-indent mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-indent

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 473 B)