Re: [oss-security] Telnetd Vulnerability Report

Justin Swartz <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Feb 2026 02:22:34 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.inetutils.bugs,gmane.comp.security.oss.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-02-25 01:18, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> On 24/02/2026 20:33, Solar Designer wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:05:58AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Who uses telnet anyway? It's deprecated. Everyone uses ssh for any 
>>> kind of remote access.
>> 
>> Indeed.  Yet:
>> 
>> Quite many people surely do still use a telnet client to access 
>> various
>> older/smaller devices
> 
> Yes. I would hazard a guess that the largest cohort of devices running 
> a telnet server are enterprise switches, gateways & routers. So many 
> times over the years I've been surprised to find a switch I'm 
> configuring has a telnet as well as the obligatory http(s) server 
> available for the admin to login via.
> 
> Albeit to a lesser extent these days, and more likely BusyBox telnetd 
> than InetUtils. But switches are one of the most likely pieces of kit 
> to be forgotten about and left running for 10+ years in a closet 
> without a firmware update. There are a LOT of old switches running out 
> there.

There're also serial port concentrators, programmable automation 
controllers, remote telemetry units, protocol gateways, data 
aggregators, and PXI/LXI instrumentation out there that run some of 
telnet daemon - and you can be sure that it's not always busybox's 
telnetd implementation.