Re: [oss-security] Telnetd Vulnerability Report
Justin Swartz <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Feb 2026 02:22:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.inetutils.bugs,gmane.comp.security.oss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-02-25 01:18, Eddie Chapman wrote: > On 24/02/2026 20:33, Solar Designer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:05:58AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: >>> Who uses telnet anyway? It's deprecated. Everyone uses ssh for any >>> kind of remote access. >> >> Indeed. Yet: >> >> Quite many people surely do still use a telnet client to access >> various >> older/smaller devices > > Yes. I would hazard a guess that the largest cohort of devices running > a telnet server are enterprise switches, gateways & routers. So many > times over the years I've been surprised to find a switch I'm > configuring has a telnet as well as the obligatory http(s) server > available for the admin to login via. > > Albeit to a lesser extent these days, and more likely BusyBox telnetd > than InetUtils. But switches are one of the most likely pieces of kit > to be forgotten about and left running for 10+ years in a closet > without a firmware update. There are a LOT of old switches running out > there. There're also serial port concentrators, programmable automation controllers, remote telemetry units, protocol gateways, data aggregators, and PXI/LXI instrumentation out there that run some of telnet daemon - and you can be sure that it's not always busybox's telnetd implementation.