bug#30402: ldconfig confusion

Reuben Thomas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.bugs
Message-ID <CAOnWdoh1fDidLRtSte-g7DfYtbAqfLaC-omvMUS6=0E8CszrCA@mail.gmail.com>
I just noticed that on my GNU/Linux system (and on stock Ubuntu 14.04,
which is where I first encountered this), I need to run

ldconfig

after installing shared libraries built with libtool. I was confused at
first, because libtool itself runs

ldconfig -n $(libdir)

But I guess because this does not update the cache, it doesn't make the
library available.

I hadn't noticed this before because normally when I'm building code on my
own system, I install it in my home directory, with a suitable setting of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH; no ldconfig call is needed.

The libtool manual says:

  7. The install 'Makefile' target should warn the package installer to
     set the proper environment variables ('LD_LIBRARY_PATH' or
     equivalent), or run 'ldconfig'.

But libtool does not warn me that I (may) need to run ldconfig.

In 1997, commit 7f9b4e50 for libtool version 0.6b, the way of running
ldconfig was changed from running without "-n" to running with "-n". The
ChangeLog entry (I think it is for the same change, though it occurs months
later in commit 41ced2149):

+       * ltconfig.in (finish_cmds): Change back to using `ldconfig -n'.
+       This makes Linux behave like other systems, which is more in line
+       with what libtool needs.

I'm not sure what it means by "what libtool needs" here, but perhaps 20
years later it's worth reconsidering this (and simply removing the -n flag
on Linux again)? Or, if it's not possible, at least warn the user that it
may be necessary to run ldconfig.

I'm using libtool version 2.4.6, but I can't see that anything has changed
in current git in this respect.​​

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org

_______________________________________________
Bug-libtool mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.