bug#75880: relax five-digit maximum on revisions?
luigi scarso <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:04:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG5iGsD59ZR+CRitFbza+MypY2JQ0KmG=DxxtCCnmwcnUajzNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000005d46b4062cb4bf8a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 19:40, Ileana Dumitrescu < [email protected]> wrote: > > I like the idea of basing it off of timestamps. From a quick search, the > longest timestamp I have seen was 18 digits. I would be fine with > changing it to something shorter or longer if there was a better use > case for it. > > Hi all, Unix epoch expressed in nanosecond is 19 digits: $ k=$(date --date='now' +%s%N); printf $k|wc -c 19 -- luigi --0000000000005d46b4062cb4bf8a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote g= mail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, 27 Jan = 2025 at 19:40, Ileana Dumitrescu <<a href=3D"mailto:ileanadumitrescu95@g= mail.com">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote = class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px sol= id rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br> I like the idea of basing it off of timestamps. From a quick search, the<br= > longest timestamp I have seen was 18 digits. I would be fine with<br> changing it to something shorter or longer if there was a better use<br> case for it.<br> <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all,=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div= >Unix epoch=C2=A0 expressed in nanosecond is 19 digits:</div><div>$ k=3D$(d= ate --date=3D'now' +%s%N); printf $k|wc -c<br>19</div><div><br></di= v><div>--</div><div>luigi</div></div></div> --0000000000005d46b4062cb4bf8a--