Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

Hello,

After removing the two lines, libtool 2.4.5 is a little slower than 2.4.2
when using /bin/dash, but it is much slower than in bash, here is the
data when compile xz: (make -j1)

       lt-2.4.2  lt-2.4.5(before patched)  lt-2.4.5(after patched)
dash     11s          21s                    13s
bash     13s          30s                    21s


We can see that dash is much faster than bash. (note, the data I had reported
before for lt-2.4.5 after patched is 11s, but today is 13s, I think that
it is because of the free disk space, the data is very stable in each day,
I tried them several times).

// Robert

On 02/04/2015 10:56 PM, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 02/04/2015 10:48 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote:
>>
>>> When reporting a bug, please describe a test case to reproduce it and
>>> include the following information:
>>>
>>>       host-triplet:   $host
>>>       shell:          $SHELL
>>>       compiler:       $LTCC
>>>       compiler flags: $LTCFLAGS
>>>       linker:         $LD (gnu? $with_gnu_ld)
>>>       version:        $progname (GNU libtool) 2.4.5
>>>       automake:       `($AUTOMAKE --version) 2>/dev/null |$SED 1q`
>>>       autoconf:       `($AUTOCONF --version) 2>/dev/null |$SED 1q`
>>
>> Perhaps libtool is accidentially executing 'automake --version' and 'autoconf
>> --version' every time it is executed?  That would certainly lead to a huge
>> slowdown.
>
> Thanks, yes, you are right, after remove the two lines, the time is the
> same as remove the whole block (11s).
>
> // Robert
>
>>
>> Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
>
>

_______________________________________________
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool