Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote:

>
>
> On 02/06/2015 12:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you are
>> although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3.  These timings are for
>> optimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux system using -j 
>> 12:
>
> I think that we can't see obviously slowdown by "make -jN",
> but "make -j1" will. And bash is much slower than dash, I'm trying to
> figure out why.

It seems like this issue is already corrected in the source tree but 
you are correct that the issue is much more apparent with -j1.

Optimized:

   2.4.2 : 3:43.43
   2.4.5 : 4:33.11

Non-Optimized:

   2.4.2 : 1:21.21
   2.4.5 : 2:05.48

We need a test case which is executed before every major release to 
make sure that a performance regression has not been introduced.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
[email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

_______________________________________________
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.