Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4
Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote: > > > On 02/06/2015 12:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >> I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you are >> although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3. These timings are for >> optimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux system using -j >> 12: > > I think that we can't see obviously slowdown by "make -jN", > but "make -j1" will. And bash is much slower than dash, I'm trying to > figure out why. It seems like this issue is already corrected in the source tree but you are correct that the issue is much more apparent with -j1. Optimized: 2.4.2 : 3:43.43 2.4.5 : 4:33.11 Non-Optimized: 2.4.2 : 1:21.21 2.4.5 : 2:05.48 We need a test case which is executed before every major release to make sure that a performance regression has not been introduced. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool