Re: How can I keep -lstdc++ out of $postdeps?

On 02/23/2017 05:01 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 22/02/17 12:16 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On 22 Feb 2017 10:32, Jack Bates wrote:
>>> How can I avoid dynamically linking with libstdc++?
>>> or, how can I keep -lstdc++ out of $postdeps?
>>
>> let's back up.  what is it you're actually trying to do ?
>> you want to create a statically linked C++ program ?
>> you want to link a C program ?
>> something else ?
>
> Well, I'm asking for a friend [1]. It sounds like he's got one version
> of libstdc++ in his build infrastructure and another (older) version on
> his production machines. He wants to avoid using the older version (I
> think because of an issue with the STL) which is why he's trying to keep
> -lstdc++ out of the linker arguments.
>
> Regardless of whether -static-libstdc++ is the solution he ultimately
> runs with, I think he's confused about _LT_SYS_HIDDEN_LIBDEPS -- as am
> I. The underlying compiler/linker seems to do a more refined job of
> adding/not adding these dependencies? Is there a recommended way to
> disable _LT_SYS_HIDDEN_LIBDEPS?

I think the path of least resistance is still to install the newer 
libstc++ (CentOS can use newer developer tools [1] and has corresponding 
library packages to my knowledge).

Thomas

[1] 
<http://blog.andrewpeabody.com/2016/06/modern-development-tools-in-centos-7.html>


_______________________________________________
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool