Re: New libtool maintainer
Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA2C=vAya2-516JgNB21hKS99CVWYMRQXOvTRKKcy=vFYqTVog@mail.gmail.com> |
On 2/8/22, Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > >> Feel free to reach out if you have pending patches/issues you want to >> "bump", ideas for improvements, general advice for a new GNU maintainer >> - and above all if you'd like to lend a hand toward getting `libtool' up >> and running again. > > Many thanks for your work on Libtool! > > I believe a good start would be to integrate suggestions and patches > from the issue tracker > > https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?group=libtool > > and maybe also some patches Debian (and other distributions) have added > over the years to the last 2.4.6 release. For instance: > > https://sources.debian.org/patches/libtool/2.4.6-15/ Some of the outstanding bugs with existing patches : https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38305 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23348 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21137 (and its dups at 22895, 31900, and 36762) https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21503 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22373 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46559 Some of the outstanding bugs without any suggested patches: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45738 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52253 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53479