Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

[snipped loads of stuff]

On 2012-10-02 16:54, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> The new branch gary/reredo-test-operand-order (notice the double re) has
> everything broken down into digestible chunks.  All the differences between
> that and master now look like improvements upon the original hand rolled
> version made by my recent scripted revisions, or else outright errors in
> the original corrected by the script.  All the errors you flagged on the
> list are corrected, as well as several others.

That last bit makes me curious :-)

> Assuming my running 'make dist' doesn't have any regressions compared to
> master, and unless you have additional problems with Windows using the
> gary/reredo-test-operand-order branch, I plan to merge the differences
> back into master in a day or two.

You're saying that you are about to:

$ git checkout master
$ git merge --strategy=recursive -X theirs gary/reredo-test-operand-order \
-m 'bla bla bla'

right?

Is that better than committing the diff between reredo-... and master
as a revert-light? Why else would you have gone through all the trouble
of making all the smaller commits in the first place?

I just fired up a test suite run...

Cheers,
Peter [who is not as alert as he used to when reading diffs]