Re: Windows Line Endings

"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Eric,

On 5 Oct 2012, at 23:42, Eric Blake <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 10:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Is there a legal way to get access
>> to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users
>> care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would
>> never use for anything else?  It pretty much sucks that everytime I
>> push a well tested (on various Unix varieties) patch, that Windows likes
>> to blow up gratuitously.  I don't mind wasting a bit of time checking
>> things on Windows, but I really don't want to also waste money on
>> Microsoft.
> 
> If you are a fan of virtual machines, it is possible to set up qemu-kvm
> under Linux to run a default-60-trial of various Windows versions
> without having to pay for a license.  Microsoft also has a documented
> means of expanding that 60 days into 180 days, which means you can test
> Microsoft products at no monetary cost at the expense of reinstalling
> your virtual machine twice per year.

Thanks for the tip.  That's no different to a working Windows install
anyway... when I worked for a company that forced me to use Windows 95
to connect to their exchange server, it needed to be reinstalled at least
once a year even though all it did was run Out Look all day!

I actually run a lot of virtual machines on my Mac, including a couple
of versions of Mac OS and Linux, and I certainly wouldn't want to
squander perfectly good hardware on an OS that I don't use, and wasn't
aware of the 180 days trials, so I'll take a look into that next time I
have half a day spare.

Do they also have similar trials for MSVC?

Any idea what the least painful version of Windows for a VM is these days
(I'm guessing XP is still the best)?

Cheers,
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.