Re: git-version-gen w/o git
Paul Eggert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCLA Computer Science Department |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/29/2012 11:12 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > This seems to be stalled because of a misconception. Can I please get > a second opinion? Please? I'm afraid I don't understand the problem well enough to offer an opinion -- maybe it's because I don't understand the desire to do maintenance without git -- but I did look over the patch and noticed that it used ">& /dev/null", which isn't portable; it should use ">/dev/null 2>&1".