Re: [PATCH] Include _CRTIMP in _putenv() declaration in EXE wrapper?sources.

Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jan 2024 00:56:31 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches
Message-ID	<ZaN3jySluSa9pmR0@vapier>

On 07 Jul 2011 15:45, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> Charles Wilson <libtool <at> cwilson.fastmail.fm> writes:
> > On 6/23/2011 5:34 AM, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> > > Re-declaring _putenv() without _CRTIMP in strict ANSI mode when using
> > > MinGW resulted in a warning because of a conflict with the previous
> > > declaration that did use _CRTIMP.
> > > 
> > > Simply add _CRTIMP to our declaration to avoid it.
> > 
> > > -int _putenv (const char *);
> > > +_CRTIMP int _putenv (const char *);
> > 
> > Probably should also add __cdecl (for correctness, not warning
> > suppression) in case the user has done a -mrtd.
> > 
> > _CRTIMP int __cdecl _putenv (const char*);
> 
>  Sorry for the delay, I left aside my struggles with libtool for some time,
> but am getting back to it now as I'd really like to not have to return to
> this again later.
> 
>  It's not totally clear to me if I should make this trivial change myself
> or whether this would be done by whoever applies the patch? FWIW I clearly
> agree that __cdecl should be there, I just didn't think about -mrtd case.

i've done it this time for you due to the vintage, but for future reference,
you should always make the updates and post v2/etc... in response to your
original patch.
-mike

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)