Re: [PATCH 05/12] ltmain.in: Don't encode RATHS which match default linker paths
Roumen Petrov <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:05:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi All Information below is not enough to understand details. Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 20:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On 25 Oct 2021 15:33, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're >>> a waste of space. This patch filters libtools list of paths to encoode and >>> removes the ones we don't need. Libtool try to avoid search path used by run-time loader. Note FSF version! Debian patched is know to be broken since decades. There is a way to adapt old releases on Unix/Linux like build systems. This is autoconf cache variable . I cannot remember exact name by is like lt_cv..dl....search...path... (1) If I remember well libtool release 2.4.7 adds configuration variable that allows default search path (2) to be set. In my cross-builds scripts I use model (1) to exclude not only path passed to libtool with --with-sysroot argument but additional path. >> how are you defining "linker" ? are you talking about the runtime linker >> (i.e. ld.so) or the build time linker (i.e. `ld`) ? > I meant the runtime linker/loader ld.so. > >> the commit message also doesn't really explain in concrete details the >> scenario you're running into. > We were seeing binaries with RPATHS like /usr/lib in them which > basically doesn't do anything useful since it is a default for ld.so. > We were therefore trying to remove those to improve the efficiency of > the binaries slightly. > > Cheers, > > Richard Regards, Roumen Petrov