Re: [PATCH] ltmain.in: don't suppress output for PIC compilations

Hello,

На 15.08.24 г. в 21:27 ч., Nick Bowler написа:
> On 2024-08-15 14:13, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
>> Printing the differences on the second run seems like a better default,
>> while keeping the option for -no-suppress for the complete log. Maybe
>> adding an informational message about -no-suppress with the diff
>> would help resolve some confusion?

Similar topic was discussed already.
Failure in static build are exceptional.
Shared and static build should produce one and the same result.
Note that you could disable shared build and in this case result or 
static build is displayed!

I prefer do not see double output in build process i.e. is in past decades.


>> However, I also wonder if the suppression should be decided by a
>> verbosity option/variable rather than a compile mode option.
> 
> Yes, I was a bit surprised to discover that the existing --verbose
> flag which is documented in the manual to
> 
>    "Print out ... additional messages not ordinary seen by default"
> 
> does not disable this suppression.  If it did, then presumably automated
> build robots (at least when it comes to Automake-generated packages)
> could just build with make LIBTOOLFLAGS=--verbose and be done.


Models static vs shared build are not related to build process trace.
Why to output static build as in 99.9999999% cases is same as shared?


> Cheers,
>    Nick
> 

Regards,
Roumen Petrov