Re: Skipping syllables / LyricExtender
Michael Käppler via bug-lilypond <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks a lot! So this is clearly a documentation issue. Am 04.01.2024 um 10:34 schrieb Paul Hodges: > This came up in the user list just a month ago, when I asked about the > use of _ instead of \skip1 causing a lyric to be misaligned because it > started a melisma. By chance I found the only (?) documented > reference to "", which solved my problem with a less ugly notation > than \skip1! It seems that \skip1, _, and "" all have subtle > differences which the documentation doesn't make sufficiently clear... > > Below is the mail that summarised these findings. > > Paul > > *From: *Michael Werner <[email protected]> > *To: *Paul Hodges <[email protected]> > *Cc: *<[email protected]> > *Sent: *04/12/2023 12:37 > *Subject: *Re: Centering a word before a gap in the lyrics > > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 6:56 AM Paul Hodges <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I don't know where in the documentation the difference in > behaviour between \skip1 and "" as opposed to _ is explained. > > > It isn't much of an explanation, but in > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/lyrics-and-repeats#index-_005cskip-1 > is the line Note: do not use an underscore, |_|, to skip notes – > an underscore indicates a melisma, causing the preceding syllable > to be left-aligned. > A bit terse, to be sure. But mentioning an alignment issue I've > always stayed with using \skip to skip over a note, and only used > _ when it really was a melisma not explicitly notated in the music > (such as a tie or a slur). > > But the opportunity is missed on these pages, the first of > which actually conflates the "" and _ notation: > > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/rhythms_003a-skips-in-lyric-mode-_00282_0029 > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/rhythms_003a-skips-in-lyric-mode > > > This was the first time I'd seen the use of "" for something like > this. I'll have to keep it in mind. And looking at those two > snippet pages you linked they make it seem like all three options > are equivalent. Yet in the NR page I linked it says they are > different. > > Well, I guess the important bit is you found something that does > what you need, and does it in a way that you're okay with. > -- > Michael > > > > *From: * Michael Käppler <[email protected]> > *To: * Paul Hodges <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > *Sent: * 04/01/2024 9:07 > *Subject: * Re: Skipping syllables / LyricExtender > > Thanks, Paul, but is this mentioned somewhere in the docs? > AFAICS, they recommend using \skip everywhere for skipping notes. > > "" is shorter and more logical, since, unlike `\skip (dur)` it > does not request the duration argument, which > is ignored in Lyrics, anyway. > > Michael > > Am 04.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Paul Hodges: >> Replace the \skip 4 with "", as in: >> >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >> \version "2.25.0" >> >> { c' (d') e' f' } >> \addlyrics { foo __ "" bar } >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >> >> Paul >> >> *From: * Michael Käppler via bug-lilypond <[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> Hi all, >> please consider the following example: >> >> \version "2.25.0" >> >> { c' (d') e' f' } >> \addlyrics { foo __ \skip 4 bar } >> >> The \skip command does not terminate the extender line. This >> is at least >> unexpected. >> Opinions? >> >> Michael >> >> >