Re: 36 doc edits (NR1 & NR2)

On 2024-12-16 17:57, Trevor Bača wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 5:32 PM Dan Eble <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

>     I am the author of this example.  I used inclusion to cut out material
>     that I thought was not essential to make my point.  I question whether
>     it is important for all examples to be complete, as you seem to suggest.
> 
>     If I am wrong about that, we could include the full song verbatim.
> 
> 
> Using an \include is a great way to simplify the example, it's just that 
> the file ("old-hundredth-example.ly <http://old-hundredth-example.ly>") 
> doesn't seem to exist in my LilyPond install. (I was testing everything 
> under 2.25.19.) Is it possible that the file somehow just wasn't bundled 
> with 2.25.19?

Distributing the file with LilyPond was not intended.  I don't think it 
would make sense either.

 > I think we should definitely preserve the example, it's
 > just that users need to be able to compile code themselves with their
 > local LilyPond to study it.

I'm not sure how to satisfy this desire without bloating LilyPond or the 
Notation Reference.  Do we have techniques for linking from the NR to 
supplementary material?
-- 
Dan