Re: Custom articulation for testing

Am Sa., 18. Jan. 2025 um 00:10 Uhr schrieb Simon Albrecht
<[email protected]>:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Looking at MR 2521 [1] again after 2544 has been merged, I wanted to try
> using Werner’s glyph within Harm’s new side-articulation feature. So I
> made the test code below (right now using "prall" glyph for test-testing
> purposes). Why does Lily say
>
> “warning: do not know how to interpret articulation: bachschleifer”
>
> ?
>
> Best, Simon
>
>
> [1] https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2521
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \version "2.25.23"
>
> %default-script-alist.bachschleifer =
> #(set! default-script-alist
>         (assoc-set! default-script-alist 'bachschleifer
>                     `((script-stencil . (feta . ("prall" . "prall")))
>                       (padding . 0.05)
>                       (avoid-slur . around)
>                       (side-axis . X)
>                       (direction . ,LEFT))))
> bachschleifer = #(make-articulation 'bachschleifer)
>
> {
>    \key g \minor
>    \time 6/8
>
>    \partial 8 g'8 |
>    es''8.[\bachschleifer d''16 c''8]
>    as''8.[\bachschleifer g''16 f''8] % \break
>    des'''8.[\bachschleifer c'''16 bes''8]
>    fis''8.[\bachschleifer e''16 d''8]
> }
>

Look at input/regression/script-custom-definition.ly for a how-to
(with already known script-glyphs).
If you want to test !2521 you'll need to recompile, otherwise the
bachschleifer-glyph will not be found.
Be ensured it'll work, I checked while working on !2544

Cheers,
  Harm