Re: Emacs: lilypond-ts-mode and the future of lilypond-mode

Saul Tobin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel
Message-ID <CAPF+3FGSHe9XOh5sD6P=g_YjVcp+OsCgbx6a7csL3A8Ti6QLGg@mail.gmail.com>
>
> git shortlog -s --after="10 years ago" elisp
>

Not to say there haven't been commits, but the majority of substantial code
hasn't been touched.


> git grep lilypond-ts-mode
>
> yields exactly zero hits in the LilyPond repository.
>
> Neither is there anything in either ELPA or MELPA to be found.
>
> If you want to solicit feedback, maybe you should put some info about it
> anywhere where it could be found?  And/or place the package in MELPA or
> some other readily available Emacs package repository?
>
> Particularly putting the package in one of the standard package
> repositories would make it simple for people to install, test, deinstall
> and/or update the package.
>

For right now, installation is manual from the Github repository linked in
my initial message.

This is partly what I wanted to get opinions regarding. Obviously
historically lilypond-mode has been shipped as a component of LilyPond
itself, but it seems better going forward to use MELPA or eventually
perhaps ELPA. If lilypond-ts-mode is to be considered official or
quasi-official, is there any objection to me going ahead and submitting to
MELPA myself?

Saul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.