Re: make doc error on current master
Federico Bruni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il giorno dom 27 lug 2025 alle 10:01:06 +00:00:00, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> ha scritto: > A similar problem with the Noto family has been recently discussed: > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2025-07/msg00073.html > > If you compile LilyPond from scratch please retry a compilation with a > FontConfig version equal to or larger than 2.15 – theoretically, > Variation Fonts should be rejected correctly. If you can't or won't > do that you have to replace the VFs with non-VF versions. I compiled LilyPond from scratch using FontConfig 2.16. $ rpm -q fontconfig fontconfig-2.16.0-2.fc42.x86_64 Fedora is using this version since January: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/fontconfig/fontconfig/fedora-42.html I don't think I can remove the VF fonts: $ sudo dnf remove *noto*-vf* Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: installed package fontconfig-2.16.0-2.fc42.x86_64 requires font(:lang=en), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package cairo-1.18.2-3.fc42.x86_64 requires libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package default-fonts-core-sans-4.2-4.fc42.noarch requires google-noto-sans-vf-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package gnome-shell-48.3-1.fc42.x86_64 requires libcairo.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - problem with installed package I guess I will have to use a container to build lilypond. Which Linux distro should work fine?