Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Modular LilyPond Parser (C++)

David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:

> "C. Stroppel" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Thanks for the clarification. I originally assumed that commands like
>> \clef would be overridable because they are defined in Scheme. After
>> trying it out, I realized that this assumption was wron - the
>> registration seems zo happen only once during startup, and later
>> definitions are ignored. So from the musician's perspective, \clef is
>> not dynamic or user-modifiable.
>
> I have no idea what you have tried to do, but you are utterly wrong
> about that.  One guess would be that you tried to redefine \clef by
> writing
>
> \clef = ...
>
> which is wrong.  You need to write
>
> clef = ...
>
> Please try this out and reevaluate your view if appropriate.

Stupid example:

clef = \time \etc
{
  \clef 3/4
  \repeat unfold 12 c'4
}


-- 
David Kastrup