Re: Asking for help: Update German translation of NR using LLM

David Kastrup <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:24:27 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Organization Organization?!?
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes:

> Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I thus wonder whether a guy with LLM experience could help with
>> updating the German translation of the Notation Reference – or
>> rather, generating a complete translation from scratch, since the
>> German translation is severely outdated.  Today, websites like Google
>> Translate provide translations (both German-to-English and
>> English-to-German) that are nearly perfect even for quite complicated
>> grammatical structures, which still amazes me.
>
> My experience is that such a translation looks nearly perfect, but the
> actual content contains hard to spot errors that can even inverse the
> meaning of some sections. I tried that for an article of mine and did
> a full evaluation. The result was that after I fixed all the errors (I
> found), I didn’t actually save time -- despite being the author of the
> original text:

Saving time is one criterion.  The mental energy required might be
better.  For me personally I find that it tends to take me much less
energy to "fix up" someone else's work than do it from scratch myself.

The actually spent time might not be the most important bit if one
option is more likely to end up with nobody doing the job at all.

I wouldn't suggest we try this approach with one of those translations
for which we have good translators doing good work.  But when we don't,
it might be worth if that approach works better for getting the required
volunteers on board.  Whether it ends up with the same amount of
workerhours is likely less relevant than whether it ends up with the
same amount of required expertise and the same amount of tediousness.

-- 
David Kastrup