Re: Backporting documentation changes?
Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Here's a list of "currently pending" MRs, should these be
> backported?
>
> !3039 Improve engraving bibliography
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3039
At your discretion. It just makes prettier output, fixing only minor
things.
> !3044 time-signature-interface: clarify style options
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3044
Yes, since Dan mentions 2.26 explicitly.
> !3053 NR: Use real apostrophe in LilyPond code example
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3053
At your discretion. It just makes prettier output.
> !3070 NR: Document some font selection problems with FontConfig
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3070
Yes.
> !3088 NR: Clarify default metric properties and exceptions
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3088
> !3096 NR: "Time administration" → "Measures"
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/3096
I vote yes for both, since Dan's explanations help a lot in understanding
the topics.
Werner