Re: How to do add-on merge requests and get a pipeline to run?

Dan Eble <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-17 09:15, David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> But that is the point.  A review works by going through the changes, and
> a stacked merge request only displays the differential changes.
> 
> That makes the stacked requests separately reviewable.  The branch
> constituents in terms of commits are the same regardless of what branch
> the MR is based off , but the reference point for the reviewable changes
> is a different one.
> 
> For reviewing single commits, you can just constrain yourself to the
> commits of interest.  For doing a review on the actually relevant
> changes, the difference is quite helpful.

Although chaotic experiences with GitHub's stacked PRs are fresh in my 
memory, I'm willing to try using GitLab's stacked MRs; however, there is 
an issue standing in the way, in my opinion.

We need to run the regression-test difference detector.  A merge request 
should not be labeled Patch::review until someone has recorded the test 
differences in the comments.
-- 
Dan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.