Re: Choosing among Versions of Sabon
Henning Hraban Ramm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, thank you for the interesting analysis! Am 17.06.26 um 23:33 schrieb Tina Petzel: > The OFL licensed EB Garamond is probably the most narrow one (note that > although this is an incredible font giving whopping 3218 glyphs it is not > professional grade — which means I’d not use it to professionally typeset a > large book or something). In what regard do you consider EBG “not professional grade”? I never used it “in production”, so I got no experience. It’s only that some good open source fonts are technically better than many Linotype/Monotype fonts that are only half-heartedly converted from Type 1 – lacking sensible OpenType features or proper Kerning… (For typesetting books, I’m a fan of Alegreya Serif, one of the “modern” “soft” Antiquas. The early versions had kerning problems, but these are long gone. For lyrics, I usually stay with LilyPond’s default text font that is based on Century Schoolbook – not the most beautiful font face, but very readible also under bad light conditions.) Hraban