Re: Text placing in bar with divided melody, after rest
Jogchum Reitsma via LilyPond user discussion <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:30:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 10-07-2026 om 05:06 schreef David Wright: > On Thu 09 Jul 2026 at 21:07:05 (+0200), Lilypond-User wrote: >> With the help on this list, I learned to use the "\set associatedVoice >> = "-construct to place lyrics correct in bars with split voices. I >> frequently use it, and it always works. >> >> Except in this case, where the split voice bar is preceded by a bar rest. >> >> I add two examples, in which the problem manifests itself in bar 9 and 10. >> >> In Lyrics_divisi.ly, I circumvented the problem by replacing the rests >> with g2, and add "bla bla bla"as text. It is rendered as wanted. >> >> In lyrics_divisi_b.ly, the problem appears when I fill bar 9 and the >> first half of bar 10 with rests. Now the text is not rendered >> correctly. >> >> I've tried a number of variants to get the result I want, but so far I >> don't see a solution. But I'm convinced there is one. >> >> Anyone who can shed some light on this? Would be very grateful (again...)! > It would take me some time to figure out which lyrics belong to which > part. I'm not sure why you set the first two bars in the manner of > American hymn books, and the rest of it in that of English ones, and > particularly the omission of the second part's f4. in measure 8. In the original edition of im André Arnesens Magnificat (we are waiting a few months already for the paid-for parts to arrive from the USA to the Netherlands...) the f4. only has stem-up, so I didn't write it in the second part. But when one doesn't take that into account, combining the two \VoiceOne/VoiceTwo constructs to one, placing o the text goes well. With \consists Merge_rests_engraver (Michael Gerdau pointed me to) it is fine. I have no idea what the diffenrence is between American hymn books and English ones, wasn't aware of those two styles... Thanks, cheers, Jogchum > > I would write it as two parts, converging at measure 13. (There are > a few other adjustments I would typically make, particularly if the > rhythms of the parts diverged at all.) > > Cheers, > David.