Re: Doc request: TeX integration with lyLuaTeX
"N. Andrew Walsh" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:28:31 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ax10xmWZL_wJz-PmmQX7ckU-mzg9afRGcZHGsaBz5G569V-fnwEQgMlRARA9oC4JY5OEN12KJT62SZfFqrEySYPOR0UK1GlwbASfaNzhCcI=@proton.me> |
He Werner, many thanks. That all looks excellent. I only brought this up in the first = place because I haven't written a document with in-line lily code yet, so I= forgot about lyluatex, and when I went to look up "lilypond in latex" I di= dn't find it. So increasing visibility is probably all that's needed. Thanks again, N. Andrew Walsh Blog:=C2=A0https://nandrewwalsh.substack.com BlueSky:=C2=A0https://bsky.app/profile/themusicianspath.bsky.social er/ihn/ihm/sein | he/him/his Berlin (neue Adresse | new address: [email protected]) On Friday, July 31st, 2026 at 08:23, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > > as I was going through trying to think how to add information about > > lyluatex, I realized you're correct. It's really more of a parallel > > toolchain than a different starting option, so if there could be a > > separate section, I agree that that would be preferable. >=20 > Given that lyluatex comes with a complete, separate manual, I only > enhanced the visibility of this package. >=20 >=20 > Werner >