Re: Doc request: TeX integration with lyLuaTeX

"N. Andrew Walsh" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:28:31 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Message-ID <ax10xmWZL_wJz-PmmQX7ckU-mzg9afRGcZHGsaBz5G569V-fnwEQgMlRARA9oC4JY5OEN12KJT62SZfFqrEySYPOR0UK1GlwbASfaNzhCcI=@proton.me>
He Werner,

many thanks. That all looks excellent. I only brought this up in the first =
place because I haven't written a document with in-line lily code yet, so I=
 forgot about lyluatex, and when I went to look up "lilypond in latex" I di=
dn't find it. So increasing visibility is probably all that's needed.

Thanks again,

N. Andrew Walsh
Blog:=C2=A0https://nandrewwalsh.substack.com
BlueSky:=C2=A0https://bsky.app/profile/themusicianspath.bsky.social
er/ihn/ihm/sein | he/him/his
Berlin
(neue Adresse | new address: [email protected])

On Friday, July 31st, 2026 at 08:23, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:

>=20
> > as I was going through trying to think how to add information about
> > lyluatex, I realized you're correct.  It's really more of a parallel
> > toolchain than a different starting option, so if there could be a
> > separate section, I agree that that would be preferable.
>=20
> Given that lyluatex comes with a complete, separate manual, I only
> enhanced the visibility of this package.
>=20
>=20
>     Werner
>