Re: mailing list moderation

On Mar 10, 2006, [email protected] (Karl Berry) wrote:

> (1) If this list is obsolete and should be deleted.  We'd keep the
>     archives, just make the address inactive, so any future mail to it
>     would bounce.

The project is not quite dead, although it's not quite active either.
Since this is the list that gets the CVS commits, it would probably be
ok to only accept postings from the CVS machinery.  Could this be
arranged, to avoid the need for manual moderation?

> (2) If the list is *not* obsolete, and should remain as a live address.
>     In many cases there is so much junk in the archives that it is hard
>     to tell, hence my query.  In other cases, I could guess, but I felt
>     it would be best to just inquire about everything.

> In case (2), if you can volunteer to help moderate the list (and/or
> others!), that would be most appreciated.

I herery volunteer to moderate these and other lists related with
cvs-utils and adhoc.

Thanks for asking, sorry about the delay in responding.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Secretary for FSF Latin America        http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}