Re: undefined-behavior obstack.c:139
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:01:11 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.comp.gnu.m4.bugs |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCLA Computer Science Department |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-12-01 10:40, Bruno Haible wrote: > Indeed, this sentence appears to forbid ((char *) NULL) + something. Yes. However, Gnulib code can still use ((char *) NULL) + something) because the Gnulib portability guidelines allow it. The issue with clang false positives is covered here: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Unsupported-Platforms.html which lists "clang -fsanitize=undefined" as an unsupported platform unless you also specify "-fno-sanitize=pointer-overflow". The obstack patch you installed is fine, as it's clearer and just as fast as the original. However, we needn't go through Gnulib and change other code merely because it runs afoul of this false alarm from clang.