Re: [PATCH] OS/2 patches
Eric Blake <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:47:25 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/22/2014 08:49 PM, KO Myung-Hun wrote: > Hi/2. > > Eric Blake wrote: >> On 09/22/2014 03:00 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote: >>> Hi/2. >>> >>> There are OS/2 patches. > >> Which branch or version are these patches against? > > > master branch. The master branch is NOT in decent shape for a release at the moment. You may be better off preparing your patches against branch-1.4 (the latest stable release) or branch-1.6 (closer to actually being in a releasable state). That said, getting master branch in good shape is also worthwhile. However, your contributions are starting to be large enough that we have to consider whether you need to file copyright assignment with the FSF. Is that something you are willing to pursue? https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org _______________________________________________ M4-patches mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-patches
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 539 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUIO1NAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqX2cH/RcRrn5M1bKn/GscVEpOWRRl m/BT1AkYtCWwHGe3duX+1e5luU94jyezDweyE2pBkzVhYdIBeYs0vFtkrWP6mx8P +IWIBBCmFjQGUhvtEMta/WblN+NCWkc38fONMdfRylPBMD+F65hhTmydEe1nEg5J h+944DJbUp6RT8euPp/3lNwADahZYmTd6nidWKs8F8kJ7TrU4AmDQ6yYOclyuWGx OYo5A8iS194ZssMZTq88dzcL2pix2x0XOUl9JAWPpbAvY+PqO9vBpdfFSwmhwiEG 4XK/ZHKShlXcnA7oOqCgPdrnrhauJDtpTatkKP9pDzdLtMzzb9WFJRLbPyckfEU= =4qeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----