Re: dumpdef a pushdef'd stack

"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Eric,

On 27 Sep 2006, at 14:20, Eric Blake wrote:
> [[...]] now that --arglength can affect dumpdef output as well as  
> trace
> output, we should be able to tweak it on the fly.  I'm thinking a  
> macro
> named debuglen is the best fit here (fitting in with the naming of  
> other
> debug* builtins), but I could also be persuaded to name the macro
> arglength to match the command-line option.  Or maybe name it  
> debuglen,
> deprecate --arglength (as that name isn't quite descriptive of what is
> really being length-limited), and introduce --debuglen as a synonym  
> to -l.
>  Thoughts?

I think the latter is more in keeping with my notional 2.0 theme of
clean and complete integration between command line options and run
time control of the same.

Cheers,
	Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  [email protected]
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFJL2gFRMICSmD1gYRApr8AKC7+fo4qSYqqXKFE0s16BO8y1YJsACeNStz
iiNzUHKC2SZV1bOwMYGMAUs=
=QCOu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.