Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Eric,

On 17 Oct 2006, at 17:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan <gary <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> On 12 Oct 2006, at 16:13, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> I still want CVS head to follow Solaris' parsing precedence
>>> rules (macros, then quotes, then comments), rather than the current
>>> behavior (comments, macros, quotes).
>>
>> Can you remind me why that is?
>
> Hmm, in Solaris, when the prefix was ambiguous between quote and  
> comment, it
> always chose quote when given a chance, even when quote was the  
> shorter
> prefix.  In GNU, on the other hand, the comment was always  
> recognized first.
> If either implementation were a strictly greedy parser, then you  
> would expect
> the longer start token to be recognized in preference to the  
> shorter one.

Although it makes perfect sense the way it is (on Solaris) considering
that POSIX documents that a matched quote token should be taken in
preference to a not yet matched comment token.

> If anything, the reason I am proposing delaying
> the recognition of comments until after macro names and quote  
> starts have been
> recognized is to match historical behavior, and so that GNU M4  
> parsing at least
> follows the order that the three token types are mentioned in POSIX.

Thanks for the nice explanation.  Yes, I definitely agree with
you now; can you add it to the TODO list, please?

Cheers,
	Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  [email protected]
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFNa1tFRMICSmD1gYRAlWIAJ4w0JLovvM2bvMH8OZZ9jRvuHuJnQCgyB74
x8EvqYSfuuDL+bLvGejZAts=
=ffPz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----