Re: [PATCH] Line synchronisation output in comments

Hi Eric,

On 28 May 2007, at 22:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 5/25/2007 11:26 AM:
>> Meanwhile, I have to port it to HEAD.  And I would also like to  
>> fix the bug
>> that I uncovered in the interactions between -s and divert (but  
>> probably only
>> on head, as I think it will be pretty invasive for a stable branch

Agreed.

>> ).  For an
>> example of the bug, note that "#line 3" is not a preprocessor  
>> directive any
>> more.
>
> Here's the port to head; I'm still playing with improving the  
> quality of
> head's syncline reporting, but wanted to get this synced up first (yes
> Gary, I'm trying to do better at keeping the branches synchronized  
> in a
> timely manner :).

Duly noted (-;

And thanks for all your recent patches and testing!

Cheers,
	Gary
-- 
   ())_.              Email me: [email protected]
   ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
   / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912

_______________________________________________
Bug-m4 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4