Re: upstream license doc change

"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Eric,

On Jul 15, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Also, an editing question - currently we have Appendix A as the GPL  
> and
> Appendix B as the FDL; would it look better to just have one  
> Appendix A
> for licenses, with A.1 being GPL and A.2 being FDL?

My reasoning was to have one appendix for the software license and  
another
for the license of the manual itself.  I don't have any strong objection
if you'd like to change it as you suggest though :-)

Cheers,
	Gary
-- 
   ())_.              Email me: [email protected]
   ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
   / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_      Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912

_______________________________________________
M4-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-patches
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.