Re: upstream license doc change
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.m4.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Eric, On Jul 15, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Also, an editing question - currently we have Appendix A as the GPL > and > Appendix B as the FDL; would it look better to just have one > Appendix A > for licenses, with A.1 being GPL and A.2 being FDL? My reasoning was to have one appendix for the software license and another for the license of the manual itself. I don't have any strong objection if you'd like to change it as you suggest though :-) Cheers, Gary -- ())_. Email me: [email protected] ( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net / )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook `(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912 _______________________________________________ M4-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/m4-patches
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed