[PATCH] Little mistake in quoting documentation

The quoting documentation has this example:

   define(`x', `substr(ab')
   define(`y', `cde, `1', `3')')
   x`'y => bcd

And it says that it behaves as substr(`abcde', `1', `3'); this is not 
exact because `ab' and `cde' are active:

   define(`ab', `AB')
   define(`cde', `CDE')
   define(`x', `substr(ab')
   define(`y', `cde, `1', `3')')
   x`'y => BCD

Therefore, the first parameter of substr behaves as ab`'cde, not 
`abcde'.  I attach a simple patch to fix this.

Paolo

2007-12-13  Paolo Bonzini  <[email protected]> (tiny change)
             Giovanni Toffetti  <[email protected]>

	* doc/m4.texinfo: Fix quoting of a quoting example.


diff --git a/doc/m4.texinfo b/doc/m4.texinfo
index 14017d8..f57402b 100644
--- a/doc/m4.texinfo
+++ b/doc/m4.texinfo
@@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ empty string.
  @cindex rescanning
  The output of macro evaluations is always rescanned.  The following
  example would yield the string @samp{bcd}, exactly as if @code{m4}
-has been given @w{@samp{substr(`abcde', `1', `3')}} as input:
+has been given @w{@samp{substr(ab`'cde, `1', `3')}} as input:

  @example
  define(`x', `substr(ab')