Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting prototypes for getenv/getopt (v2 of Khem Raj's patch)

Shubham Chakraborty <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:58:48 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.make.bugs
Message-ID <CABvxksxiaCHe=Ssra8Aq_SHfHGKrfBpmYtGeBUAKkfhuepwrXQ@mail.gmail.com>
--0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Thanks for your feedback

I'll drop the incremental patch approach and instead look into moving this
toward the gnulib-port integration.
I will make sure that any work I submit is based on the existing GNU Make
and Gnulib sources and written manually, following project guidelines.

Best Regards
Shubham

On Sun, 19 Apr, 2026, 9:38 pm Paul Eggert, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2026-04-19 01:16, Shubham Chakraborty wrote:
> > Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating all
> > declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the
> gnulib-port
> > approach?
>
> The latter of course. But I'm reluctant to use an LLM for this, due to
> copyright reasons.
>

--0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks for your feedback</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I&#39;ll drop the incremental patch a=
pproach and instead look into moving this toward the gnulib-port integratio=
n.</div><div dir=3D"auto">I will make sure that any work I submit is based =
on the existing GNU Make and Gnulib sources and written manually, following=
 project guidelines.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Bes=
t Regards</div><div dir=3D"auto">Shubham=C2=A0</div></div><br><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">O=
n Sun, 19 Apr, 2026, 9:38 pm Paul Eggert, &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]=
cla.edu">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex">On 2026-04-19 01:16, Shubham Chakraborty wrote:<br>
&gt; Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating al=
l<br>
&gt; declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the gnulib=
-port<br>
&gt; approach?<br>
<br>
The latter of course. But I&#39;m reluctant to use an LLM for this, due to =
<br>
copyright reasons.<br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb--