Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting prototypes for getenv/getopt (v2 of Khem Raj's patch)
Shubham Chakraborty <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:58:48 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.make.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABvxksxiaCHe=Ssra8Aq_SHfHGKrfBpmYtGeBUAKkfhuepwrXQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks for your feedback I'll drop the incremental patch approach and instead look into moving this toward the gnulib-port integration. I will make sure that any work I submit is based on the existing GNU Make and Gnulib sources and written manually, following project guidelines. Best Regards Shubham On Sun, 19 Apr, 2026, 9:38 pm Paul Eggert, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-04-19 01:16, Shubham Chakraborty wrote: > > Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating all > > declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the > gnulib-port > > approach? > > The latter of course. But I'm reluctant to use an LLM for this, due to > copyright reasons. > --0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks for your feedback</div><div dir= =3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I'll drop the incremental patch a= pproach and instead look into moving this toward the gnulib-port integratio= n.</div><div dir=3D"auto">I will make sure that any work I submit is based = on the existing GNU Make and Gnulib sources and written manually, following= project guidelines.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Bes= t Regards</div><div dir=3D"auto">Shubham=C2=A0</div></div><br><div class=3D= "gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">O= n Sun, 19 Apr, 2026, 9:38 pm Paul Eggert, <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]= cla.edu">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm= ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le= ft:1ex">On 2026-04-19 01:16, Shubham Chakraborty wrote:<br> > Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating al= l<br> > declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the gnulib= -port<br> > approach?<br> <br> The latter of course. But I'm reluctant to use an LLM for this, due to = <br> copyright reasons.<br> </blockquote></div> --0000000000000d6611064fd2aedb--