Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting prototypes for getenv/getopt (v2 of Khem Raj's patch)

--0000000000001cd05c064ff1eb5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Thanks for the input.

I see the point about incremental improvement, and I do have a consistent
fix prepared locally for the getopt-related declarations.

However, since Paul suggested moving in the gnulib-port direction, I'll
start looking into that approach and follow up with something concrete
there.

Regarding the email address  66 was just the first available suggestion
after it rejected 23 so I went with it.

Thanks,
Shubham

On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 11:18=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Goncharov <dgoncharov@users=
.sf.net>
wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 4:17=E2=80=AFAM Shubham Chakraborty
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating all
> declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the gnulib-po=
rt
> approach?
>
> "Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection." - (Mark Twain
> ?)
>
> i have a question for you though. Was chakrabortyshubham at gmail.com
> really taken, as well as chakrabortyshubham1, etc. and you had to take
> chakrabortyshubham66?
>
> regards, Dmitry
>

--0000000000001cd05c064ff1eb5b
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><p>Hi,</p><p>Thanks for the input.</p><p>I see the point a=
bout incremental improvement, and I do have a consistent fix prepared local=
ly for the getopt-related declarations.</p><p>However, since Paul suggested=
 moving in the gnulib-port direction, I&#39;ll start looking into that appr=
oach and follow up with something concrete there.</p><p>Regarding the email=
 address=C2=A0 66 was just the first available suggestion after it rejected=
 23 so I went with it.</p><p>Thanks,<br>Shubham</p></div><br><div class=3D"=
gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at =
11:18=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Goncharov &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]=
.net" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-lef=
t:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 4:17=
=E2=80=AFAM Shubham Chakraborty<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">cha=
[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; Would you prefer that I send a corrected incremental patch updating al=
l declarations consistently, or instead help move this toward the gnulib-po=
rt approach?<br>
<br>
&quot;Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection.&quot; - (Ma=
rk Twain ?)<br>
<br>
i have a question for you though. Was chakrabortyshubham at <a href=3D"http=
://gmail.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">gmail.com</a><br>
really taken, as well as chakrabortyshubham1, etc. and you had to take<br>
chakrabortyshubham66?<br>
<br>
regards, Dmitry<br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000001cd05c064ff1eb5b--