Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?

Ralf Wildenhues <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.make.devel
Organization Department of Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Matt McCutchen wrote on Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:06:10AM CEST:
> Yes.  I suppose this is the real problem: if automake generates a
> multiline command script that relies on shell state not being preserved,
> it would have to add parentheses to work in .ONESHELL mode, but that
> would be slow on Cygwin.  IMO, the solution is for automake to avoid
> generating such scripts by splitting the lines into separate targets.
> Code generated by automake is already subject to many portability
> constraints; what's one more?  :D

We try to avoid portability constraints stemming from GNU tools (and
other free software tools) by fixing these tools instead.  Also, a split
into separate targets has other implications beside avoiding this issue.

Cheers,
Ralf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.