Re: patch for .SHELLFLAGS and .POSIX

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:42 -0400, David Boyce wrote:
> I've modified my previous work to follow a couple of your
> recommendations (.SHELLFLAGS expands the same as SHELL and is not
> marked 'special'), so as far as I can tell, based on limited, ad-hoc
> testing, it's a good patch. I'm working on .ONESHELL now. If you'd
> like the .SHELLFLAGS/.POSIX patch separately, let me know and I'll
> brush it up and send it in.

If it's not too much trouble I'd rather have them separately.  If it's a
big hassle then never mind.