Re: multi-threaded compiling

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:00 PM Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 13:37 +0100, Mischa Baars wrote:
> > > I'd still like to hear why you aren't simply using "make -j".
> >
> > That's because I don't want to define static compile and link targets
> > for every new project I start. The Makefile in question contains only
> > a few lines of code and some environment variables, but works on
> > every new project as long as you follow certain guidelines regarding
> > the directory structure. It scans, compiles and links on the fly.
>
> I don't find this argument compelling.  It's relatively straightforward
> to create a makefile environment that "works on every new project as
> long as you follow certain guidelines regarding the directory
> structure" while still using parallel builds, that will "scan, compile,
> and link" on the fly, using things like the wildcard function, pattern
> rules, etc.
>
> You are merely trading a bit of extra complexity in your makefile for a
> whole lot of complexity and tricky hacking in bash, as can be seen by
> following this thread.
>

Only the Makefile is functional right now. The bash script is not working.
Good enough to reduce compile time from 1:43 to 0:10. I would have liked to
see the script working.

But if you prefer to re-invent make's parallel build capabilities in
> bash, certainly that's your prerogative.
>