Re: MinGW to get a sandboxed SF upgraded system

On 15/01/13 18:23, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> The sandbox has been updated with the a recent repository version of
>>> the code; it looks much better now.  I'm thinking this change will be
>>> released on Jan 11th based on the ticket data that fixed some of the
>>> ugliness.
>>>
>>> http://sf-tvansteenburgh-7025.sb.sf.net/projects/mingw/
>>
>> The fix has been pushed to the SF production server.  I think it is
>> time we upgrade before they do it for us.  I believe the git URI paths
>> will differ so we'll need to modify the cloned repositories to point
>> to the new URI.  Comments?
>
> Can I assume that silence is a shout for 'GO FOR IT'?

If you think we're ready, then yes; my principal residual concern was 
the corruption of package names in the web menus, but I guess we can 
live with that.

Remapping of repository clones should be as simple as an edit of the 
local meta-data.  For hg it's the "default" line in .hg/hgrc; I don't 
know what the git equivalent is, but I guess it's similar.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612