Re: SF Tickets system
Greg Chicares <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2013-01-31 15:48Z, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Currently we have four tickets systems for the project. I'm thinking > of moving that to just one tickets system with a name of "Issues". > I've been working in the "Bugs" ticket system and would rename it to > "Issues". I would then move the data from "Support Requests", > "Patches" and "Feature Requests" into the "Issues" ticket system as I > review those tickets. An issue that begins as a feature or support request can evolve into a patch, new code in the repository, etc.; then, testing that can produce defect reports. It's better to keep the whole topic together in a single tracker. It doesn't make much sense to group topics by the manner in which they began. And one tracker is easier to search than many. > Links in the archives and other tickets are already invalidated with > the SF upgrade so this is not an issue to consider. Then this is a golden opportunity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan