Re: Thinking toward mingw64 and mingw-get

Cesar Strauss <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/26/2013 9:08 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about the possibilities of the MinGW project offering
> both 32bit versions and 64bit versions of software.  So we'll offer
> mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc, etc and the end user experience in using
> mingw-get to do so.
>

Where should they be installed by default?

Option 1)

If the system is 32-bit:
   c:\MinGW -> mingw32
   No mingw64 option (it wouldn't run on a 32-bit system)

If the system is 64-bit:
   c:\MinGW   -> mingw64
   c:\MinGW32 -> mingw32

Option 2) (Same as option 1, but c:\MinGW32 -> c:\MinGW\32)

If the system is 32-bit:
   c:\MinGW -> mingw32
   No mingw64 option (it wouldn't run on a 32-bit system)

If the system is 64-bit:
   c:\MinGW    -> mingw64
   c:\MinGW\32 -> mingw32

Option 3)
   c:\MinGW32 -> mingw32
   c:\MinGW64 -> mingw64

Option 4)
   c:\MinGW\32 -> mingw32
   c:\MinGW\64 -> mingw64

The advantage of options 2 and 4 is that we have everything under one 
root only (c:\MinGW). The advantage of options 3 and 4 is that the paths 
are predictable (do not depend on the host architecture). The 
disadvantage of options 3 and 4 is the added redundancy if you only want 
the native compiler.

Regards,

Cesar


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.