Re: Thinking toward mingw64 and mingw-get

Earnie Boyd <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.devel
Message-ID <CA+sc5mmbeJfOpS+6hyBdLQS1+-Ly7CnhU7wp6xdbr4pbGo7maQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:44 AM, waterlan wrote:
> Earnie Boyd schreef op 2013-02-27 01:08:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you are thinking about. Wherefore do you want
>>> an
>>> mingw64 subsystem?
>>>
>>
>> I'm thinking about the possibilities of the MinGW project offering
>> both 32bit versions and 64bit versions of software.  So we'll offer
>> mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc, etc and the end user experience in using
>> mingw-get to do so.
>
>
> But if you want to offer a mingw64-gcc then I assume it should also be
> able to produce win64 programs. That is why I was thinking of mingw-w64.

Yes, that will be correct.

> Or do you only want to offer a mingw64-gcc that can only target win32?
>

That would be ridiculous.

> Ideally you want to offer mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc that both can
> produce 32 and 64 bit programs, just by using the -m32/-m64 switch.

I think I prefer cross compilers but perhaps allow mingw64-gcc the
ability to use -m32/-m64 regardless.

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.