Re: Windows CE support in MinGW.org headers

On 12/19/2016 4:12 PM, Keith Marshall wrote:
> Do we really want to keep this?  Right now, I see a dozen WinCE
> specific references, distributed among five W32API header files.
> Not only does this barely scratch the surface of what would need
> to change, to properly support WinCE, but AFAICT, much of it is
> wrong anyway.
> 
> Frankly, this is a maintenance burden I would prefer not to carry.
> Unless someone else is prepared to take this on, I propose ripping
> out all of the existing WinCE specific references.  FWIW, I have
> already done this for <winuser.h> and <wingdi.h>, while retaining
> the attached patch to reinstate them; (the FIXMEs are my additions,
> indicating what I perceive to be wrong with the present references,
> and how I believe they should be corrected).


Hard for me to say.  I doubt anyone using MinGW for WinCE anyway.  Maybe
tag the repository so someone looking might have a chance to find what
was included to begin with.

-- 
Earnie

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel