Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built

On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 07:28  PM, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
>   OK, I have it generating a dll file now.  I still need to test if 
> ObjC *works* with the DLL, but I thought I'd run this diff out to see 
> if anyone spots any problems this might cause (I can't imagine what, 
> but...)

   The DLL seems to work.

   The only issues are:

	- The install doesn't create a symlink from from libobjc.dll to 
libobjc-1.dll (my cross host is Unix, so a symlink should work fine)
	- '--disable-static' doesn't prevent the libobjc.a from getting built

   Still, the patch seems like a big improvement since I can actually 
*use* a DLL now.  I can manually fix the items above trivially, so if 
someone could commit the ltcf-c.sh patch in MinGW and on the head of 
whatever GCC branches are appropriate, that would be great (or I can 
send the patch again to gcc-patches, if that is required).

-tim