Re: [PATCH] Add missing definitions to winnt.h

Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> 
> ons, 2002-06-19 kl. 11:31 skrev Danny Smith:
> >
> > OK, I have tracked down (unoffical}  usages of some of these defines,
> > but they  indicate that they belong in ntddk.h or ntifs.h headers.   I
> > think we should limit mingw version of winnt.h and other w32api user
> > headers to what is in the public interface for w32api.  Undocumented
> > device and kernel driver definitions do not belong here, IMO.  Maybe
> > we've already included some of these already, but if so, that is not an
> > excuse to continue.
> >
> > Danny
> 
> So, if I find these in w32api, it is okay to send patches to remove them
> from w32api (and add them to the DDK instead)? Then we can have them in
> the same set of headers.
> 

Yes.  However, should we move the removed ones to a deprecated.h??  Then
if someone complains we can point them to that header.

Earnie.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.