Re: RFC: Work around POSIX non-conformity of Microsoft's dup2() function
Eli Zaretskii <eliz-mXXj517/[email protected]> Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:45:16 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
PiBGcm9tOiBLZWl0aCBNYXJzaGFsbCA8a2VpdGhAdXNlcnMub3Nkbi5tZT4KPiBEYXRlOiBGcmks IDI1IEp1biAyMDIxIDE5OjM2OjAwICswMTAwCj4gCj4gVGhlIGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24gZGVzY3Jp YmVzIGl0IGFzIGEgUE9TSVggZnVuY3Rpb24sIChpbiBuYW1lIGF0IGxlYXN0LAo+IGFuZCBhbGJl aXQgZGVwcmVjYXRlZCBmb3IgdXNlIHdpdGggTVNWQyksIGJ1dCBpdHMgYmVoYXZpb3VyIGRlZmlu aXRlbHkKPiBkb2VzIE5PVCBjb25mb3JtIHRvIHRoZSBQT1NJWC4xIHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24uCj4g Cj4gSSd2ZSB3cml0dGVuIGEgZGVzY3JpcHRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGlzc3VlLCBhbmQgcHJvcG9zZWQg Y29ycmVjdGl2ZSBhY3Rpb24sCj4gYXMgdGlja2V0IGh0dHBzOi8vb3Nkbi5uZXQvcHJvamVjdHMv bWluZ3cvdGlja2V0LzQyNTYxCj4gCj4gSSB3b3VsZCBhcHByZWNpYXRlIGEgcmV2aWV3IG9mIG15 IHByb3Bvc2VkIGNoYW5nZXMsIGJ5IHRoZSBNaW5HVyB1c2VyCj4gY29tbXVuaXR5LiAgSW4gdGhl IGFic2VuY2Ugb2YgYW55IG9iamVjdGlvbnMsIEkgcGxhbiB0byBpbmNvcnBvcmF0ZSB0aGUKPiBw cm9wb3NlZCAob3B0aW9uIDQpIGNoYW5nZSBpbnRvIHRoZSBuZXh0IG1pbmd3cnQgcmVsZWFzZS4K ClRoYW5rcywgSSBjb21tZW50ZWQgdGhlcmUuCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpNaW5HVy1Vc2VycyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTWluR1ctVXNlcnNA bGlzdHMub3Nkbi5tZQoKVGhpcyBsaXN0IG9ic2VydmVzIHRoZSBQb3N0aW5nIEV0aXF1ZXR0ZSwg YXMgZGVzY3JpYmVkIGF0IGh0dHBzOi8vbWluZ3cub3Nkbi5pby9pbmRleC5odG1sP3BhZ2U9bWFp bGluZy5odG1sI2xpc3QtZXRpcXVldHRlLgpXZSBhc2sgdGhhdCB5b3UgYmUgcG9saXRlIGFuZCBk byB0aGUgc2FtZS4gIERpc3JlZ2FyZCBmb3IgdGhlIGxpc3QgZXRpcXVldHRlIG1heSBjYXVzZSB5 b3VyIGFjY291bnQgdG8gYmUgbW9kZXJhdGVkLgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWW91IG1heSBjaGFuZ2UgeW91ciBNaW5HVyBBY2NvdW50IE9w dGlvbnMgb3IgdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUgYXQ6Cmh0dHBzOi8vbGlzdHMub3Nkbi5tZS9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL21pbmd3LXVzZXJzCkFsc286IG1haWx0bzptaW5ndy11c2Vycy1yZXF1ZXN0QGxpc3Rz Lm9zZG4ubWU/c3ViamVjdD11bnN1YnNjcmliZQ==