Re: Parameter group duplicating

I hadn't thought of this. I'm not sure how straightforward it would be
to alter the number of parameters at run time. However, I suspect there
could be an elegant solution where we allow some machines to interpret
the sequencer channel number differently. That is, instead of
interpreting it like a MIDI channel, allow the channel number to index
the "new" oscillators.

I'll keep this in mind, doesn't sound terribly hard to implement on the
host end. 


On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 00:13, Vectrex wrote:
> Just like to mention an idea for putting in a provision for machines to be able to duplicate groups of parameters. What I mean would be similar to what some buzz 
> machines do now by putting some things like the lfo in the track section so the user can add more tracks to get more lfo's. This is really a hack so it'd be nice 
> to have this done properly for octal. I heard that the machines will probably be able to group parameters into windows explorer style groups so (if the machine 
> allows it) it'd be nice to right click on the group name and add a duplicate. This adds a nice amount of flexibility in what machines can do without going too nuts 
> with modular stuff. If you have no idea what I'm talking about fire up buzz and add tracks to the ld0d jacinth. It's great because it starts nice and simple with 
> just one lfo/env section, but you can add upto 16 in the track section! But this gets REAL messy in buzz
> 
> Cameron Bonde
> www.imaginemysurprise.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Octal-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/octal-dev