Re: [bug #68195] Incorrect Bode plots with ILL-conditioned systems
Doug Stewart <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.octave.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAohRsYxLYw9Ax4wMAvdXF=eyDpS0tXMkWuZQSkf15-GmFseXw@mail.gmail.com> |
Please use the bug tracker to post updates to a bug report. The mailing list is intended as a read-only notification stream. Info posted to this mailing list address won't appear in the tracker database where it is most useful. Those 2 Bode plots are from completely different transfer functions. starting magnitude is different ending phase angle is different Uper significant frequency is different. I can't test it now. On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 09:22, Luiz Antonio Maccari Junior < [email protected]> wrote: > Please use the bug tracker to post updates to a bug report. The mailing > list is intended as a read-only notification stream. Info posted to this > mailing list address won't appear in the tracker database where it is most > useful. > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #68195 (group octave): > > If someone wants to test it on MATLAB the code is: > > ----------------------------- > > clear > clc > close all > > load('octave') > > fields = fieldnames(So_KF); > > fields > > num1=So_KF.num{1,1}.poly > den1=So_KF.den{1,1}.poly > > So_KF_tf = tf(num1,den1) > > > num2=So_LQG.num{1,1}.poly > den2=So_LQG.den{1,1}.poly > > So_LQG_tf = tf(num2,den2) > > freq=[1:10:10e4]; > > figure > bode(So_LQG_tf,freq) > > figure > bode(So_KF_tf,freq) > > ----------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68195> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via Savannah > https://savannah.gnu.org/ > -- DAS[image: Certificate for 206392] <https://linuxcounter.net/user/206392.html>